Hari Hara Veera Mallu Part 1 Review: A Visual but Vague Epic
Hari Hara Veera Mallu: Part 1 leans on Pawan Kalyan’s star power, but poor VFX and weak writing make it a forgettable epic.

There’s a certain nostalgia in walking into a theatre for a historical epic, especially with a star like Pawan Kalyan, an actor whose presence alone stirs excitement. Expectations ran high. Hari Hara Veera Mallu: Part 1 set out to offer grandeur, rebellion, and a daring heist of the Koh-i-Noor from Aurangzeb. What arrived on screen, though, was a film torn between ambition and execution.
Performances
This film rides almost entirely on Pawan Kalyan’s shoulders. He enters the frame like a force of nature. His presence is electric. Fans will be thrilled in the first few minutes. He brings a fire, a swagger that still hits. But as the film progresses, something feels missing. Not from him, but from the writing around him. There’s charisma, yes, but not enough conflict and not enough emotional stakes.
Bobby Deol, in his Telugu debut as Aurangzeb, deserved more. His look is striking. His moments are few. Despite their on-screen appeal, Nidhhi Agerwal, Nora Fatehi, and Nargis Fakhri are reduced to brief flashes with little character depth.
Story & Direction
The story had promise. A rebel plotting a heist of the Koh-i-Noor from the Mughal Empire is cinematic gold on paper. But Krish Jagarlamudi’s direction, while visually rich, struggles to bring cohesion. The first half shows some spark with well-staged action and moments of real tension. But the second half drifts. The plot begins to thin. The emotion fades. What could have been a layered narrative turns into a string of elevation shots with no emotional payoff. You begin to wonder if the film is more focused on building a mythology around its hero than on telling an actual story.
Visual Quality of the Film
Let’s talk about the elephant in the room: the visual effects. For a film that reportedly cost Rs 250 crore, the VFX looks shockingly outdated. The action sequences feel disjointed. The grandeur of palaces and war scenes is constantly let down by green screen backdrops that don’t blend. But credit where it’s due. The production design tries hard. The sets feel massive. The costumes are detailed. If only the visual effects team had matched the ambition.
Music and Background Score
When M. M. Keeravani is on board, expectations run high. He’s a master of epic soundscapes. But here, the music doesn’t leave a lasting impression.
Songs like Maata Vinaali and Asura Hananam are fine in isolation, but they don’t elevate the scenes they’re in. The background score does more heavy lifting, especially in the hero’s entry sequences, but it too fades into the noise after a point.
Thematic Execution
There’s a strong ideological undercurrent to the film, with themes of Dharma, rebellion, and righteous anger painted in bold strokes. But somewhere along the way, the film loses its nuance. The messaging feels forced. The dialogues sound more like declarations. You can sense the film trying to make a statement, but it forgets to make us feel.
Verdict
Hari Hara Veera Mallu: Part 1 had the blueprint of a blockbuster, a legendary star, a mythical heist, rich sets, an epic score. But it forgot to build a beating heart inside that spectacle. What we get is a film that looks grand, sounds heroic, but often feels hollow. It plays to the gallery with scenes built for Pawan Kalyan’s fanbase. But take away the star moments, and what’s left feels hollow in story and sentiment.
Rating: 2.5 / 5
Also Read : Kuberaa Review: Sekhar Kammula Pushes Beyond His Comfort Zone